Sunday, December 28, 2014

Punctuation: Oxford Comma: Yes? No? Maybe!?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/ptM7FzyjtRk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Recommended by MLA... but not the AP Stylebook.




Spacing 1x or 2x after each sentence: A definitive answer from Slate


Innovation, the Internet, gadgets, and more.   Jan. 12 2011 6:00 AM

Space Invaders

Why you should never, ever use two spaces after a period.

Extra space.

Can I let you in on a secret? Typing two spaces after a period is totally, completely, utterly, and inarguably wrong.

And yet people who use two spaces are everywhere, their ugly error crossing every social boundary of class, education, and taste.*  You'd expect, for instance, that anyone savvy enough to read Slate would know the proper rules of typing, but you'd be wrong; every third email I get from readers includes the two-space error. (In editing letters for "Dear Farhad," my occasional tech-advice column, I've removed enough extra spaces to fill my forthcoming volume of melancholy epic poetry, The Emptiness Within.) The public relations profession is similarly ignorant; I've received press releases and correspondence from the biggest companies in the world that are riddled with extra spaces. Some of my best friends are irredeemable two-spacers, too, and even my wife has been known to use an unnecessary extra space every now and then (though she points out that she does so only when writing to other two-spacers, just to make them happy).

What galls me about two-spacers isn't just their numbers. It's their certainty that they're right. Over Thanksgiving dinner last year, I asked people what they considered to be the "correct" number of spaces between sentences. The diners included doctors, computer programmers, and other highly accomplished professionals. Everyone—everyone!—said it was proper to use two spaces. Some people admitted to slipping sometimes and using a single space—but when writing something formal, they were always careful to use two. Others explained they mostly used a single space but felt guilty for violating the two-space "rule." Still others said they used two spaces all the time, and they were thrilled to be so proper. When I pointed out that they were doing it wrong—that, in fact, the correct way to end a sentence is with a period followed by a single, proud, beautiful space—the table balked. "Who says two spaces is wrong?" they wanted to know.

Typographers, that's who. The people who study and design the typewritten word decided long ago that we should use one space, not two, between sentences. That convention was not arrived at casually. James Felici, author of the The Complete Manual of Typography, points out that the early history of type is one of inconsistent spacing. Hundreds of years ago, some typesetters would end sentences with a double space, others would use a single space, and a few renegades would use three or four spaces. Inconsistency reigned in all facets of written communication; there were few conventions regarding spelling, punctuation, character design, and ways to add emphasis to type. But as typesetting became more widespread, its practitioners began to adopt best practices. Felici writes that typesetters in Europe began to settle on a single space around the early 20th century. America followed soon after.
Every modern typographer agrees on the one-space rule. It's one of the canonical rules of the profession, in the same way that waiters know that the salad fork goes to the left of the dinner fork and fashion designers know to put men's shirt buttons on the right and women's on the left. Every major style guide—including the Modern Language Association Style Manual and the Chicago Manual of Style—prescribes a single space after a period. (The Publications Manual of the American Psychological Association, used widely in the social sciences, allows for two spaces in draft manuscripts but recommends one space in published work.) Most ordinary people would know the one-space rule, too, if it weren't for a quirk of history. In the middle of the last century, a now-outmoded technology—the manual typewriter—invaded the American workplace. To accommodate that machine's shortcomings, everyone began to type wrong. And even though we no longer use typewriters, we all still type like we do. (Also see the persistence of the dreaded Caps Lock key.)

The problem with typewriters was that they used monospaced type—that is, every character occupied an equal amount of horizontal space. This bucked a long tradition of proportional typesetting, in which skinny characters (like I or 1) were given less space than fat ones (like W or M). Monospaced type gives you text that looks "loose" and uneven; there's a lot of white space between characters and words, so it's more difficult to spot the spaces between sentences immediately. Hence the adoption of the two-space rule—on a typewriter, an extra space after a sentence makes text easier to read. Here's the thing, though: Monospaced fonts went out in the 1970s. First electric typewriters and then computers began to offer people ways to create text using proportional fonts. Today nearly every font on your PC is proportional. (Courier is the one major exception.) Because we've all switched to modern fonts, adding two spaces after a period no longer enhances readability, typographers say. It diminishes it.

Type professionals can get amusingly—if justifiably—overworked about spaces. "Forget about tolerating differences of opinion: typographically speaking, typing two spaces before the start of a new sentence is absolutely, unequivocally wrong," Ilene Strizver, who runs a typographic consulting firm The Type Studio, once wrote. "When I see two spaces I shake my head and I go, Aye yay yay," she told me. "I talk about 'type crimes' often, and in terms of what you can do wrong, this one deserves life imprisonment. It's a pure sign of amateur typography." "A space signals a pause," says David Jury, the author of About Face: Reviving The Rules of Typography. "If you get a really big pause—a big hole—in the middle of a line, the reader pauses. And you don't want people to pause all the time. You want the text to flow."

This readability argument is debatable. Typographers can point to no studies or any other evidence proving that single spaces improve readability. When you press them on it, they tend to cite their aesthetic sensibilities. As Jury says, "It's so bloody ugly."

But I actually think aesthetics are the best argument in favor of one space over two. One space is simpler, cleaner, and more visually pleasing. (It also requires less work, which isn't nothing.) A page of text with two spaces between every sentence looks riddled with holes; a page of text with an ordinary space looks just as it should.

Is this arbitrary? Sure it is. But so are a lot of our conventions for writing. It's arbitrary that we write shop instead of shoppe, or phone instead of fone, or that we use ! to emphasize a sentence rather than %. We adopted these standards because practitioners of publishing—writers, editors, typographers, and others—settled on them after decades of experience. Among their rules was that we should use one space after a period instead of two—so that's how we should do it.

Besides, the argument in favor of two spaces isn't any less arbitrary. Samantha Jacobs, a reading and journalism teacher at Norwood High School in Norwood, Colo., told me that she requires her students to use two spaces after a period instead of one, even though she acknowledges that style manuals no longer favor that approach. Why? Because that's what she's used to. "Primarily, I base the spacing on the way I learned," she wrote me in an email glutted with extra spaces.
Several other teachers gave me the same explanation for pushing two spaces on their students. But if you think about it, that's a pretty backward approach: The only reason today's teachers learned to use two spaces is because their teachers were in the grip of old-school technology. We would never accept teachers pushing other outmoded ideas on kids because that's what was popular back when they were in school. The same should go for typing. So, kids, if your teachers force you to use two spaces, send them a link to this article. Use this as your subject line: "If you type two spaces after a period, you're doing it wrong."
 

*Correction, Jan. 18, 2011: This article originally asserted that—in a series of emails described as "overwrought, self-important, and dorky"—WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange used two spaces after every period. Assange actually used a monospace font, which made the text of his emails appear loose and uneven. (Return.)


Farhad Manjoo is a technology columnist for the New York Times and the author of True Enough.

Thursday, June 5, 2014

EXCEL: Plotting Multiple Data Sets onto the Same Chart

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/MHNpG__dNnc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Sunday, June 1, 2014

SlideShare: MLA Formatting

<iframe src="http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/35369551" width="427" height="356" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" style="border:1px solid #CCC; border-width:1px 1px 0; margin-bottom:5px; max-width: 100%;" allowfullscreen> </iframe> <div style="margin-bottom:5px"> <strong> <a href="https://www.slideshare.net/Frau209/formatting-mla-reports" title="Formatting mla reports" target="_blank">Formatting mla reports</a> </strong> from <strong><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/Frau209" target="_blank">Frau209</a></strong> </div>

Share directly from SlideShare?
SlideShare no longer recognizes my email accounts.

Parts of a Block Letter with Student Notes

 By J. T.

<iframe src="http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/35367558" width="427" height="356" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" style="border:1px solid #CCC; border-width:1px 1px 0; margin-bottom:5px; max-width: 100%;" allowfullscreen> </iframe> <div style="margin-bottom:5px"> <strong> <a href="https://www.slideshare.net/Frau209/letter-notes-student" title="Parts of a Block Letter with Student Notes " target="_blank">Parts of a Block Letter with Student Notes </a> </strong> from <strong><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/Frau209" target="_blank">Frau209</a></strong> </div>

Old format?  This works on Deutsch-heute.

Check SLIDESHARE; login and show from there.


FAN LETTER Template


                                                         Activity Overview
Use this activity to write a letter to someone you admire –
famous musician, actor/actress, athlete, or author – or a company whose product you like.
The purpose of the letter is to request an autographed picture or a product sample.
Find real addresses for famous people by using the web or go the company website to find the address customer inquiries can be sent.

The tone of your letter should be polite and courteous.
Remember to spell check and proofread your letter for proper grammar.

Instructions:
1.              Open a new document in Word.

2.              Format your letter in block style. Use either your home address for the return address or 150 Fairway Drive (02852) and use the current date.  Find an address to send your letter.

3.              The letter should be a minimum of 3 paragraphs long.

If you are writing a letter to a famous person or group requesting a picture
---use the following format.

Paragraph 1  Introduce yourself and state why you are such a fan.  Also state the purpose of the letter:  to obtain an autographed picture.
Paragraph 2  Describe the reasons you would like a picture, and why it would mean so much to you.
Paragraph 3  Conclude by thanking the recipient; include a way for you to be contacted.

If you are writing a letter to a company – use the following format

Paragraph 1  Introduce yourself.  For example:  My name is ______. 
I am a student at North Kingstown HS and I am very interested in ______.                     I have a couple of questions for you and I hope ….                                                          Or I wanted you to know what I think about (Some product, etc.).
Paragraph 2   Ask your questions or give your compliments. 
Tell a story.  This is the meat of your letter.
Paragraph 3   Let them know how they can reply or reach you in the future.                                     Suggest that if they ever need a volunteer to test a new product or to give feedback, you would be happy to do it.  Thank them for their time.

4.              Save the letter as FANLET.

5.              Print the letter, as well as an envelope, using the MAIL tab. Sign your name; fold the letter in thirds; tuck bottom 2/3’s into envelope; and hand in for credit.

6.              Post the letter ASAP, and share any response with our class!

Sunday, May 18, 2014

Think Like A Commoner to Save the Planet: The Imperative Work of David Bollier

 OpEdNews  Article by Burl Hall   May 18, 2014



David Bollier  (image by David Bollier)

Every one of us is faced with increasing levels of air, water and land pollution. Not a one of us is going to escape the consequences of our collective behavior. This is not an "us and them" nor an "us vs them" situation. We are at a point where the consequences of our actions scream to all of us, "YOU need to change! Don't fight the corporations. Stop living the lifestyle they want you to live and which you buy into." 

One of the changes caused by our lifestyle is our climate. For example, consider the following graph regarding CO 2 levels from NASA:

CO2 Emmisions  (image by NASA)  (co image cropped) http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
 
Perhaps our planet is at-risk for becoming a desert void of any life. Check out this video:
 
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/dwwVo3CEFAQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Many say that the external world is a mirror to what is within us. We project ourselves onto the world. Think about this relationally. How does this image of the tar sands relate to the way our children are being educated through the "no child left behind" mentality. In that state, which boils down to teaching to the test, what is happening to our children's minds? Are we creating a planet of wastelands, be they of mind, matter or atmosphere? 

All of these are one. This planet is a hall of mirrors. 

What are some of the drivers to this situation that cause us to create such horrible wastelands? I would state our philosophies of life that lead to our lifestyles, which are spurred by corporations that tend to brainwash us into thinking that their products are what we need. But, blaming the corporations doesn't get us off the hook. Ultimately, our first step is to say "no more" to several thousand years of conditioning dating back to pre Greco-Roman civilization. 

That's a lot of conditioning to go through. But, that's exactly what is needed. Ultimately, it's about our changing whether the corporations and government do or not. James Burke puts it beautifully at the end of his wonderful documentary, "The Day the Universe Changed":
"If the universe is what you say it is, then please say!" 

I doubt you would say "Make it so" to a world of tar sands oil fields. The only piece I would add is that first you have to look at what you are currently saying. 

Corporation-based schooling entices us into dependence through getting us to believe that we need them to employ us, provide us with food and shelter, and entertain us. Yes, folks await the stock market reports to declare the health of the economy. Meanwhile we embody their lie: Not living in line with corporations entails a sure death physically and/or of a lifestyle that they have convinced us we need to survive. To reinforce this issue, how often do we listen for statistics on the "job market?"
"The Lord giveth, and the Lord taketh away" was not originally spoken of the Corporation. WE have allowed that translation. What is actually "too big to fail" is the Earth not the banks. It is past time for us to reconsider where our true livelihood comes from and where our true allegiance lies.
Next Page

Does it have to be this way? Do we need to kill the Earth and ourselves? On a less intense level, do we need to work hours on end for dwindling pay and benefits? Can we move beyond what is coming to be out-and-out slavery?......

Interestingly, most ancient cultures lived in unison with the land and each other. They were not apart from the ecosystem in which they lived. They were a part of it. Indeed, the entire Earth was seen as what we today call the "Commons". 

But, then came the Greeks and Romans. These folks created an actual "legal" definition of the Commons. As illustrated in the following:
The concept of the commons dates back to Roman law. According to the Romans, property was divided by distinct definition. One definition was being private, which of course were things that people could own. The other was public, which was defined as those things built by municipalities, governing bodies, and the government. http://www.environmentalcommons.org/commons.html
 
Of course, this doesn't take into account what is natural, such as the air we breathe or the water we drink. Nor does it account for the wild animals, plants and landforms that provide us and other creatures with food, shelter and companionship. Are any of these truly our property? Is our wife or husband our property? Are our children our property? Are the animals we bond with and help us with survival truly ours? 

These are deep questions we need to ask ourselves. It is interesting that Native American tribes often explored the ramifications of a decision they were contemplating unto the 7th generation. Our shortsighted corporations meanwhile tend to look at their profits for one to five years and don't attend to the future generations. "Our children be damned," is the battle cry. Take another look at the tar sands oilfields that will become our children's hell. Do we remember the dust bowl of the 1930s? Do we understand that we are headed to a thousand times worse in the 2030s if we don't honor the commons?

Ultimately, everything we do affects everything else. Everything IS the commons. Even breathing entails a dance of keeping a balance between oxygen and carbon dioxide. We operate as one living planetary system! Planet Earth is THE Commons. 

One of the primary champions of the Commons is David Bollier. David is an author, activist, blogger and consultant who spends a lot of time exploring the commons as a new paradigm of economics, politics and culture. David has written, co-authored or co-edited thirteen books. In his most recent book, Think Like a Commoner, David describes the logic, worldview and ethics of the commons, and the burgeoning international movement of commoners, especially in Europe and the global South. He summarizes the book by stating it, "provides a succinct overview of the great diversity of commons in the world and the many pernicious enclosures now being fought." This masterpiece has received glowing endorsements from the likes of Bill McKibben, Ralph Nader, Maude Barlow, David Korten, Michel Bauwens and Peter Barnes.  Some powerful folks there! 

David also states, "the commons is not so much a fixed, universal thing as a general concept describing durable, dynamic sets of social relationships for managing resources -- all sorts of resources: digital, urban, natural, indigenous, rural, cultural, scientific, to use some crude categories. Each commons has its own distinctive character because each is shaped by its particular location, history, culture and social practices. The term commoning means to suggest that the commons is really more of a verb than a noun. It is a set of ongoing practices, not an inert physical resource."
Think of this "commoning" in terms of Earth scientist James Lovelock's Gaia Hypothesis which states that the Earth kindled biological life on this planet by a system of interactions. These interactions helped to unfold the potentials of the creatures and plants that have inherited and populated this Earth. These interactions are not in conflict, overall. Indeed, we breathe in oxygen that plants breathe out and the plants breathe in carbon dioxide, which we breathe out. It is by this relationship that this planet works. 

This planet is a Commons! While David may not say this blatantly, I would bet he at least respects what I'm saying. Yet we sell our Soul, our children's Soul, and the Earth's Soul to the Corporation. Or, as the song sings: 

You load sixteen tons, what do you get?
Another day older and deeper in debt!
Saint Peter don't ya call me cause I can't go
 I owe my Soul to the company store.

Does this song speak to you regarding credit card debt and loans that take a lifetime to pay off? Are you just a sharecropper on the land the bank owns in your name? Dare you continue being a standardized consumer being manipulated by the "man behind the curtain?" 

Who is that Wizard ultimately spouting fire, smoke and abusive words at Dorothy (the Soul, Dor-thea, beloved of God). The power is not in the man behind the curtain for he is ultimately exposed as a farce. He is nothing more nor less than a living human being. Who disclosed him? It's none other than the little dog Toto (Dorothy's instinctual power). Dorothy ultimately knows better.
Once we truly open our eyes, we too will know better.

Who is our Wizard? Dare we expose him without and within ourselves and move on? Or do we continue to worship the illusionary "man behind the curtain?" How do we find him? "Just follow the yellow brick road," (i.e., the gold.) Follow the money and you will find the charlatan.



Monopoly Man
(image by Life in the Boomer Lane)

Is the Wizard truly the man smoking the cigar? Or is the Wizard about all of us, our shallow ego minds that are exclusive of nothing or no one? Consider the following poem called "Mind Without Fear" in a collection called Gitanjali: Song Offerings by Rabindranath Tagore:
Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high;"Where knowledge is free;"Where the world has not been broken up"into fragments by narrow domestic walls;"Where words come out from the depth of truth;"Where tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection;"Where the clear stream of reason"has not lost its way into the dreary desert sand of dead habit;"Where the mind is led forward by thee into ever-widening thought and action---"Into that heaven of freedom, my Father, let my country awake.
Ultimately, it is we that need to change. We must discard the holier-(wiser, wealthier, needier, worthier, stronger, better)-than-thou curtain behind which we conceal our interdependent humanity and step out as "we the (common) people." When we awaken, the Earth come alive.
To listen to an interview of David Bollier by Envision This, visit:

Online Culture Radio at Blog Talk Radio with ENVISION THIS on BlogTalkRadio
 
My wife and I have a copy of David's book. The first person that emails us with their address, we will be happy to send it to them. If you come in second or thereafter, I do encourage you to read the book. I did. It's a goldmine. 

The Amazon site for David's book is:

For your information, I'm copying two reviews from David's Amazon Page:

"The Commons is among the most important and hopeful concepts of our time, and once you've read this book you'll understand why!"
---Bill McKibben, author Deep Economy
 
'Think Like a Commoner is a brilliant, accessible, practical, path-breaking intellectual tour de force. A defining contribution to the New Economy movement and an essential read for everyone who cares about the human future. I expect to return to it as a basic reference for years to come."
---David Korten, author, Agenda for a New Economy, board chair YES! Magazine, and co-chair, New Economy Working Group 

---
Burl Hall is an avid writer and publishes to OpEd News. He is author of "Sophia's Web: Reclaiming Wholeness in a Divided World," which has been accepted for publication by Pari Publishing. Burl's primary passion is in the unity of world religions to science and the holographic nature of the universe in which the part mirrors the whole. Burl and his wife, Merry, are also hosts of a Blog Talk Radio Show called "Envision This!"


Friday, April 11, 2014

Presentation Backfires; Rescues (Prezi)

PREZI HELPS US FEEL THE PAIN OF PRESENTATION GLITCHES -- SO THAT WE CAN PREPARE AGAINST THEM

http://blog.prezi.com/latest/2014/1/8/how-prezi-might-just-save-you-from-an-on-stage-meltdown-and.html/?utm_source=em0bday&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=gro&utm_term=a3701839721

Click on the "Learn to keep cool" link.

HERE are the YOUTUBES shared here:

Hollywood director, producer, Michael Bay,  melts down when there's a glitch:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/23ypkgYO4Rc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Who can wing things better?  Look at what Steve Jobs does in the same scenario...
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/_NNdOy0TJSk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


Sunday, March 23, 2014

PRE-ANCHOR PRESENTATION GUIDELINES

NKHS Technology Readiness Anchor Presentations

Look at the rubric often! 
 Match your presentation to its guidelines!
 INTERESTING INFORMATION only, please!
in over  3 - but less than  6 - minutes.


A      It’s important that you have a visual presentation to accompany 
        your well-selected and well-prepared text, 
        and that there be no full sentences on any slides.  


B.    Your oral work should include several zingers
        which will be phrases you wish your audience to remember.  
        Let your audience know when your zingers are coming, but setting them up properly.  

         Zinger by JFK (1st -- and only --  inaugural address):

         Ask not what your country can do for you.              
         Ask what you can do for your country.                                 

                     Set up:     And so my fellow Americans..   
                       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLdA1ikkoEc

                    That line prepared us to tune in.  Then it rewarded those who did.



OTHER  Potential set-ups for your “zingers” …. Which can you add? 
   
      --   Believe me when I say that…    
      --   I don’t know about you, but I ….
      --  You can imagine that...            
      --   And here's the surprising part: 


C.     Your OUTLINE  (structure)  is critical.  
         Not even the best presenter can rescue something that is carelessly prepared.
         (Watch videos:  Michael Bay and Steven Jobs  --   http://blog.prezi.com/latest/2014/1/8/how-prezi-might-just-save-you-from-an-on-stage-meltdown-and.html/?utm_source=em0bday&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=gro&utm_term=a3701839721)

  •         Edit and streamline your text until you can fill the time
  •         with accurate, solid information 
  •         told in an interesting way, 
  •         before you begin illustrating your words.  
  •         Work hard as you design your slides -- to commit this text to memory.  
  •         Aim not to look at the screen during your presentation!

D.       Over-animating keeps your audience waiting.   
           Only animate images for those topics you are discussing at that moment.  


E.        Practice!  
           You'll need time outside of class.  
           Use the TIMER:  Keep track of time.  
           Do you need additional research?  (Even additional categories?)  
           TOO MUCH DETAIL is also costly.     


F.        From the beginning, save your sources, 
           perhaps in the footer; perhaps on the last slide.


G.        Pre-Anchor
            Present a career to your classmates.   

            Both the Introduction and also conclusion must help summarize
                 the body of your presentation,  
                 in an interesting way. 
        
             (YES.  This basic information reaches your listeners three times!)



H.         Consider including:

  • details of successful daily job performance;
  • details of how you learned about this job;
  • skills / tools needed for success; path/s to acquire them
including specific programs/colleges
  • challenges to success (costs; location; exclusivity, etc.)
  • benefits of being successful 
  • other information from your table  (monthly budget; first car...)
  • where you might work!  (Google it; find where you might be needed now.) 
  • In RI:  http://www.dlt.ri.gov/jobseeker.htm  (Department of Labor and Training)  

Sunday, March 9, 2014

10 ROOKIE PRESENTATION MISTAKES -- by Prezi

This is a blog post by Terry Gault, Managing Partner and Vice President of The Henderson Group.   Here, Mr. Gault provides insight into how to become a better presenter by avoiding a few common mistakes. Terry oversees all curriculum and services at The Henderson Group. In addition he is responsible for the selection, training and development of all trainers and facilitators for The Henderson Group, and has been an instructor with the Henderson Group for over 15 years.

HERE IS THE PRESENTATION BY MR GAULT

Be sure to check out the comments also.   

Thursday, February 13, 2014

V Sauce : You Don't Type Alone

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/pPXxhgdtcXs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

So, while you strike that ENTER key, how many other people in the world are doing the exact same thing?

 

 

 

Monday, February 3, 2014